Making BETTER SENSE ......Digital Infrared Analysis and Specialized Breast Clinical Examination

Low income and resources country are recommended by the 

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 

that Breast Clinical Exam is a potential aid to downstage current local statistics..

Imagine this : Specialized Trained Hands AIMING where a Metabolical Image tells them to...

Here is the Message , clear and simple:

 if you can see go for the red area , if you don´t go where Warmer is felt. 

Now , it is logical , it does not fight the system and can actually HELP.

Would you forward the IDEA????

BIRADS III , to be or not to be , a little hand where weakness exist

BIRADS III , see it for yourself:?

IVa or II

Add metabolic Information : 
Digital Infrared Analysis

Metabolic Assimetry is rapidly oriented to the left side

Highest Metabolical area is defined

And coincidental with the " BIRADS III "

Final Pathological Report :

Invasive Ductal Carcinoma .......

Makes me wonder , if it is logical and even physiological it could easily help where Morphology is UNCLEAR , NOT DEFINED , DOUBTFUL or MISDIAGNOSE...

Don´t you think so

Bye....

Dense Breast Aid , SIMPLE AND EASY

Simple and easy there is no doubt and Standards are Changing and including by LAW the comment that includes BREAST DENSITY .

Dense breast tissue  not only is at  risk for more active tissue , but it is obviously a 

VISUAL Obstacle for Xray definition.

Even Clinically suspicious as the following case are reported  surprisingly as totally benign : BIRADS I 

 Morphological complement with Ultrasound clearly defines the even palpable nodule , great complement fortunately , enough for clinical decision making ........

Complementary Digital Infrared Image were these:

 Basal Frontal 

Basal Oblique Right

 Basal Oblique Left  Views

Functional Frontal 

Functional Right Oblique

Functional Left Oblique 

Close up.

COMMENT :

For me there is no DOUBT , Dense Breasts cannot rely only on Mammography , I am guessing everyone agrees.

Complementary procedures are obviously Needed.

Ultrasound when clinically evident is great.

"Infrared when clinically ASYMPTOMATIC , could help guide ULTRASOUND and define :

SUBCLINICAL POSITIVE BREAST CARCINOMAS" 

EMC

And you can quote me on that ........

So here is the thing : around 30-40 percent of cases are diagnosed in women 45 years or younger , population defined radiologically as Possible DENSE BREAST .....

That is why even after 40 MILLION mammograms in  the US every year 20-30 percent are clinically evident.

And will be , if we do not try anything else...

To include an adaptative strategy for non INVASIVE or  IONIZING Screening in these women that are not candidates for Mammography or Have an anatomical BARRIER for Xrays.

It not only MAKES SENSE but it is a true LOGICAL POSSIBILITY.

Think about it and SMILE.

Welcome to open your minds and eyes.....

I think you should give it a try....

See you.